RudderStack vs Shynet
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
RudderStack
Open-source customer data pipeline platform
VS
Shynet
Modern, privacy-friendly, detailed web analytics
| Feature | RudderStack | Shynet |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,465 | ★ 3,145 |
| First released | 2019 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Segment | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is RudderStack or Shynet better?
Neither is universally better. RudderStack has the larger community, while Shynet is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are RudderStack and Shynet free and open-source?
Yes. RudderStack is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Shynet under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run RudderStack and Shynet with Docker?
RudderStack: yes. Shynet: yes.