Feed dashboard nono Reader-self vs Winds

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFeed dashboard nono Reader-selfWinds
CategoryRSS & News ReadersRSS & News Readers
LicenseMITMIT
LanguagePHPJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM128 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, dockerdocker
GitHub stars★ 153★ 9,115
First released20132017
ReplacesGoogle Reader, FeedlyFeedly

Why pick each one

Choose Feed dashboard nono Reader-self if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in PHP
Feed dashboard nono Reader-self details

Choose Winds if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 9.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
Winds details

Frequently asked questions

Is Feed dashboard nono Reader-self or Winds better?

Neither is universally better. Winds has the larger community, while Feed dashboard nono Reader-self is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Feed dashboard nono Reader-self and Winds free and open-source?

Yes. Feed dashboard nono Reader-self is licensed under MIT and Winds under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Feed dashboard nono Reader-self and Winds with Docker?

Feed dashboard nono Reader-self: yes. Winds: yes.

Related comparisons