Goeland vs yarr
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Goeland
Feed aggregator that forwards items to email and webhooks
VS
yarr
Yet another RSS reader as a single binary
| Feature | Goeland | yarr |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | binary, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 200 | ★ 3,919 |
| First released | 2020 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Feedly, IFTTT | Feedly, Google Reader |
Why pick each one
Choose Goeland if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Goeland or yarr better?
yarr is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Goeland if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Goeland and yarr free and open-source?
Yes. Goeland is licensed under MIT and yarr under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Goeland and yarr with Docker?
Goeland: yes. yarr: yes.