SHSelfHostIndex

Feed reader nono Antennapod-server-Wenholt vs Winds

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FE Feed reader nono Antennapod-server-Wenholt Minimal self-hostable RSS reader with a JSON API VS WI Winds Beautiful open-source RSS and podcast application
FeatureFeed reader nono Antennapod-server-WenholtWinds
CategoryRSS & News ReadersRSS & News Readers
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM256 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker
GitHub stars★ 1,926★ 9,115
First released20192017
ReplacesFeedlyFeedly

Why pick each one

Choose Feed reader nono Antennapod-server-Wenholt if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Feed reader nono Antennapod-server-Wenholt details

Choose Winds if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 9.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
Winds details

Frequently asked questions

Is Feed reader nono Antennapod-server-Wenholt or Winds better?

Neither is universally better. Winds has the larger community, while Feed reader nono Antennapod-server-Wenholt is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Feed reader nono Antennapod-server-Wenholt and Winds free and open-source?

Yes. Feed reader nono Antennapod-server-Wenholt is licensed under MIT and Winds under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Feed reader nono Antennapod-server-Wenholt and Winds with Docker?

Feed reader nono Antennapod-server-Wenholt: yes. Winds: yes.

Related comparisons