Coldsweat vs RSSHub
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Coldsweat
Web RSS aggregator and reader with a Fever API
VS
RSSHub
Generate RSS feeds for sites that lack them
| Feature | Coldsweat | RSSHub |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | SCSS | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 146 | ★ 45,646 |
| First released | 2013 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Google Reader, Feedly | Feedly |
Why pick each one
Choose Coldsweat if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in SCSS
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Coldsweat or RSSHub better?
RSSHub is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Coldsweat if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Coldsweat and RSSHub free and open-source?
Yes. Coldsweat is licensed under MIT and RSSHub under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Coldsweat and RSSHub with Docker?
Coldsweat: yes. RSSHub: yes.