rs-short vs Reduced.to
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted url shorteners options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
rs-short
Lightweight link shortener written in Rust, with features such as
VS
Reduced.to
Open-source modern URL shortener and link management
| Feature | rs-short | Reduced.to |
|---|---|---|
| Category | URL Shorteners | URL Shorteners |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Rust | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | — | ★ 705 |
| First released | 2020 | 2022 |
| Replaces | — | Bitly, Rebrandly |
Why pick each one
Choose rs-short if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- Written in Rust
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Reduced.to if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is rs-short or Reduced.to better?
Neither is universally better. Reduced.to has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are rs-short and Reduced.to free and open-source?
Yes. rs-short is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Reduced.to under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run rs-short and Reduced.to with Docker?
rs-short: check the project docs for container support. Reduced.to: yes.