Velero vs UrBackup
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Velero
Backup and migrate Kubernetes cluster resources
VS
UrBackup
Client-server backup for files and disk images
| Feature | Velero | UrBackup |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | C |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | kubernetes, helm | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,187 | ★ 890 |
| First released | 2017 | 2011 |
| Replaces | Kasten K10 | Carbonite |
Why pick each one
Choose Velero if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 10.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Choose UrBackup if…
- Good for backing up many PCs
- Image backup support
- Central management
Frequently asked questions
Is Velero or UrBackup better?
Neither is universally better. Velero has the larger community, while UrBackup is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Velero and UrBackup free and open-source?
Yes. Velero is licensed under Apache-2.0 and UrBackup under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Velero and UrBackup with Docker?
Velero: check the project docs for container support. UrBackup: yes.