Velero vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureVeleroSeaweedFS
CategoryBackup & RecoveryFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyHardHard
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentkubernetes, helmdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 10,187★ 33,952
First released20172015
ReplacesKasten K10Amazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Velero if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 10.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
Velero details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Velero or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Velero and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Velero is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Velero and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Velero: check the project docs for container support. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons