Reaparr vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureReaparrSRS
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageC#C++
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker
GitHub stars★ 680★ 29,105
First released20262025
Replaces

Why pick each one

Choose Reaparr if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in C#
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Reaparr details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Reaparr or SRS better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Reaparr and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. Reaparr is licensed under GPL-3.0 and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Reaparr and SRS with Docker?

Reaparr: yes. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons