Readrops vs Winds

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureReadropsWinds
CategoryRSS & News ReadersRSS & News Readers
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageKotlinJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM64 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentbinarydocker
GitHub stars★ 572★ 9,115
First released20192017
ReplacesFeedlyFeedly

Why pick each one

Choose Readrops if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Kotlin
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Readrops details

Choose Winds if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 9.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
Winds details

Frequently asked questions

Is Readrops or Winds better?

Neither is universally better. Winds has the larger community, while Readrops is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Readrops and Winds free and open-source?

Yes. Readrops is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Winds under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Readrops and Winds with Docker?

Readrops: check the project docs for container support. Winds: yes.

Related comparisons