Gibbon vs Stud.IP
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted learning & courses options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Gibbon
Open-source school management and learning platform
VS
Stud.IP
Open-source course management system for universities
| Feature | Gibbon | Stud.IP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Learning & Courses | Learning & Courses |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 620 | ★ 100 |
| First released | 2010 | 2003 |
| Replaces | PowerSchool, Blackboard | Blackboard, Moodle |
Why pick each one
Choose Gibbon if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
Frequently asked questions
Is Gibbon or Stud.IP better?
Gibbon is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Stud.IP if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Gibbon and Stud.IP free and open-source?
Yes. Gibbon is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Stud.IP under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Gibbon and Stud.IP with Docker?
Gibbon: yes. Stud.IP: check the project docs for container support.