RAGFlow vs Upscayl

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted self-hosted ai options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureRAGFlowUpscayl
CategorySelf-Hosted AISelf-Hosted AI
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM8,192 MB4,096 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetesbinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 87,057★ 47,833
First released20242022
ReplacesNotebookLMTopaz Gigapixel AI

Why pick each one

Choose RAGFlow if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 87.1k GitHub stars
RAGFlow details

Choose Upscayl if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 47.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Upscayl details

Frequently asked questions

Is RAGFlow or Upscayl better?

Neither is universally better. RAGFlow has the larger community, while Upscayl is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are RAGFlow and Upscayl free and open-source?

Yes. RAGFlow is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Upscayl under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run RAGFlow and Upscayl with Docker?

RAGFlow: yes. Upscayl: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons