RAGFlow vs Roo Code
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted self-hosted ai options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
RAGFlow
RAG engine with deep document understanding
VS
Roo Code
Customizable AI dev team inside VS Code
| Feature | RAGFlow | Roo Code |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Self-Hosted AI | Self-Hosted AI |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 8,192 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 87,057 | ★ 24,355 |
| First released | 2024 | 2024 |
| Replaces | NotebookLM | GitHub Copilot, Cursor |
Why pick each one
Choose RAGFlow if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 87.1k GitHub stars
Choose Roo Code if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 24.4k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is RAGFlow or Roo Code better?
Neither is universally better. RAGFlow has the larger community, while Roo Code is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are RAGFlow and Roo Code free and open-source?
Yes. RAGFlow is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Roo Code under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run RAGFlow and Roo Code with Docker?
RAGFlow: yes. Roo Code: check the project docs for container support.