Quartz vs Wiki.js

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureQuartzWiki.js
CategoryBlogging PlatformsNotes & Knowledge Base
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptVue
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentsource, binarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 12,960★ 28,727
First released20212017
ReplacesNotion, MediumConfluence, Notion

Why pick each one

Choose Quartz if…

  • Great for note publishing
  • Fast static output
Quartz details

Choose Wiki.js if…

  • Flexible and full-featured
  • Many auth options
  • Good content management
Wiki.js details

Frequently asked questions

Is Quartz or Wiki.js better?

Neither is universally better. Wiki.js has the larger community, while Quartz is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Quartz and Wiki.js free and open-source?

Yes. Quartz is licensed under MIT and Wiki.js under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Quartz and Wiki.js with Docker?

Quartz: check the project docs for container support. Wiki.js: yes.

Related comparisons