Quartz vs TiddlyWiki
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Quartz
Publish a digital garden from Markdown notes
VS
TiddlyWiki
A non-linear personal web notebook in a single file
| Feature | Quartz | TiddlyWiki |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Wikis & Documentation |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | source, binary | binary, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 12,960 | ★ 8,622 |
| First released | 2021 | 2004 |
| Replaces | Notion, Medium | Notion, OneNote |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Quartz or TiddlyWiki better?
Neither is universally better. Quartz has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Quartz and TiddlyWiki free and open-source?
Yes. Quartz is licensed under MIT and TiddlyWiki under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Quartz and TiddlyWiki with Docker?
Quartz: check the project docs for container support. TiddlyWiki: check the project docs for container support.