ioquake3 vs Unciv

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featureioquake3Unciv
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseGPL-2.0MPL-2.0
LanguageCKotlin
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binary, sourcebare-metal, binary, docker
GitHub stars★ 2,789★ 11,071
First released20052018
ReplacesQuake III Arena originalCivilization V

Why pick each one

Choose ioquake3 if…

  • Stable and modern
  • Active community
ioquake3 details

Choose Unciv if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 11.1k GitHub stars
Unciv details

Frequently asked questions

Is ioquake3 or Unciv better?

Unciv is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider ioquake3 if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are ioquake3 and Unciv free and open-source?

Yes. ioquake3 is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Unciv under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run ioquake3 and Unciv with Docker?

ioquake3: check the project docs for container support. Unciv: yes.

Related comparisons