SHSelfHostIndex

qBittorrent vs Radarr

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
QB qBittorrent Bittorrent client that aims to be a good alternative to all other VS RA Radarr Movie collection manager for Usenet and BitTorrent users
FeatureqBittorrentRadarr
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0-or-laterGPL-3.0-only
LanguageC++C#
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM50 MB100 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 39,327★ 14,127
First released20232023
ReplacesµTorrent—

Why pick each one

Choose qBittorrent if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0-or-later license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
qBittorrent details

Choose Radarr if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0-only license
  • Mature project with 14.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C#
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 100 MB RAM
Radarr details

Frequently asked questions

Is qBittorrent or Radarr better?

qBittorrent is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Radarr if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are qBittorrent and Radarr free and open-source?

Yes. qBittorrent is licensed under GPL-3.0-or-later and Radarr under GPL-3.0-only. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run qBittorrent and Radarr with Docker?

qBittorrent: check the project docs for container support. Radarr: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons