Spacedrive vs XBackBone

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSpacedriveXBackBone
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageRustPHP
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB50 MB
Deploymentbinarybare-metal
GitHub stars★ 38,732★ 1,161
First released20222023
ReplacesGoogle Drive, DropboxWeTransfer

Why pick each one

Choose Spacedrive if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 38.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in Rust
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Spacedrive details

Choose XBackBone if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in PHP
XBackBone details

Frequently asked questions

Is Spacedrive or XBackBone better?

Neither is universally better. Spacedrive has the larger community, while XBackBone is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Spacedrive and XBackBone free and open-source?

Yes. Spacedrive is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and XBackBone under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Spacedrive and XBackBone with Docker?

Spacedrive: check the project docs for container support. XBackBone: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons