Spacedrive vs Syncthing-Fork

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSpacedriveSyncthing-Fork
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0MPL-2.0
LanguageRustJava
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinarybare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 38,732★ 2,534
First released20222017
ReplacesGoogle Drive, DropboxDropbox, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose Spacedrive if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 38.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in Rust
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Spacedrive details

Choose Syncthing-Fork if…

  • Actively maintained
  • No central server needed
Syncthing-Fork details

Frequently asked questions

Is Spacedrive or Syncthing-Fork better?

Neither is universally better. Spacedrive has the larger community, while Syncthing-Fork is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Spacedrive and Syncthing-Fork free and open-source?

Yes. Spacedrive is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Syncthing-Fork under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Spacedrive and Syncthing-Fork with Docker?

Spacedrive: check the project docs for container support. Syncthing-Fork: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons