Spacedrive vs Snapdrop

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSpacedriveSnapdrop
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageRustJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 38,732★ 19,707
First released20222017
ReplacesGoogle Drive, DropboxAirDrop

Why pick each one

Choose Spacedrive if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 38.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in Rust
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Spacedrive details

Choose Snapdrop if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 19.7k GitHub stars
Snapdrop details

Frequently asked questions

Is Spacedrive or Snapdrop better?

Neither is universally better. Spacedrive has the larger community, while Snapdrop is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Spacedrive and Snapdrop free and open-source?

Yes. Spacedrive is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Snapdrop under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Spacedrive and Snapdrop with Docker?

Spacedrive: check the project docs for container support. Snapdrop: yes.

Related comparisons