Spacedrive vs RcloneView

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSpacedriveRcloneView
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageRustC++
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary
GitHub stars★ 38,732★ 2,941
First released20222017
ReplacesGoogle Drive, DropboxMountain Duck, Cyberduck

Why pick each one

Choose Spacedrive if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 38.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in Rust
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Spacedrive details

Choose RcloneView if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (2.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
RcloneView details

Frequently asked questions

Is Spacedrive or RcloneView better?

Neither is universally better. Spacedrive has the larger community, while RcloneView is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Spacedrive and RcloneView free and open-source?

Yes. Spacedrive is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and RcloneView under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Spacedrive and RcloneView with Docker?

Spacedrive: check the project docs for container support. RcloneView: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons