Spacedrive vs qrcp

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSpacedriveqrcp
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageRustGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 38,732★ 10,491
First released20222018
ReplacesGoogle Drive, DropboxAirDrop, Snapdrop

Why pick each one

Choose Spacedrive if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 38.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in Rust
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Spacedrive details

Choose qrcp if…

  • Instant phone transfers
  • Zero configuration
qrcp details

Frequently asked questions

Is Spacedrive or qrcp better?

Neither is universally better. Spacedrive has the larger community, while qrcp is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Spacedrive and qrcp free and open-source?

Yes. Spacedrive is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and qrcp under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Spacedrive and qrcp with Docker?

Spacedrive: check the project docs for container support. qrcp: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons