Prowlarr vs qBittorrent

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureProwlarrqBittorrent
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0-onlyGPL-3.0-or-later
LanguageC#C++
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM50 MB50 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 6,979★ 39,327
First released20232023
ReplacesµTorrent

Why pick each one

Choose Prowlarr if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0-only license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 7k GitHub stars
  • Written in C#
Prowlarr details

Choose qBittorrent if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0-or-later license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
qBittorrent details

Frequently asked questions

Is Prowlarr or qBittorrent better?

Neither is universally better. qBittorrent has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Prowlarr and qBittorrent free and open-source?

Yes. Prowlarr is licensed under GPL-3.0-only and qBittorrent under GPL-3.0-or-later. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Prowlarr and qBittorrent with Docker?

Prowlarr: check the project docs for container support. qBittorrent: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons