Profilarr vs qBittorrent

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureProfilarrqBittorrent
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0-onlyGPL-3.0-or-later
LanguageTypeScriptC++
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM50 MB50 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 2,515★ 39,327
First released20242023
ReplacesµTorrent

Why pick each one

Choose Profilarr if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0-only license
  • Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Profilarr details

Choose qBittorrent if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0-or-later license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
qBittorrent details

Frequently asked questions

Is Profilarr or qBittorrent better?

qBittorrent is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Profilarr if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Profilarr and qBittorrent free and open-source?

Yes. Profilarr is licensed under GPL-3.0-only and qBittorrent under GPL-3.0-or-later. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Profilarr and qBittorrent with Docker?

Profilarr: check the project docs for container support. qBittorrent: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons