Highlight.io vs Umami
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Highlight.io
Open-source session replay and product monitoring
VS
Umami
Simple, fast, privacy-focused web analytics
| Feature | Highlight.io | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,357 | ★ 38,103 |
| First released | 2021 | 2020 |
| Replaces | LogRocket, Sentry | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Highlight.io or Umami better?
Umami is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Highlight.io if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Highlight.io and Umami free and open-source?
Yes. Highlight.io is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Umami under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Highlight.io and Umami with Docker?
Highlight.io: yes. Umami: yes.