Polaris vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePolarisSRS
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageRustC++
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 2,715★ 29,105
First released20172025
ReplacesSpotify

Why pick each one

Choose Polaris if…

  • Low resource usage
  • Single binary deployment
Polaris details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Polaris or SRS better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community, while Polaris is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Polaris and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. Polaris is licensed under MIT and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Polaris and SRS with Docker?

Polaris: yes. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons