Planka vs Tracks

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePlankaTracks
CategoryProject Management & TasksProject Management & Tasks
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-2.0
LanguageJavaScriptRuby
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 12,330★ 1,238
First released20192004
ReplacesTrelloTodoist, OmniFocus

Why pick each one

Choose Planka if…

  • Fast real-time updates
  • Familiar interface
  • Lightweight
Planka details

Choose Tracks if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Ruby
Tracks details

Frequently asked questions

Is Planka or Tracks better?

Planka is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Tracks if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Planka and Tracks free and open-source?

Yes. Planka is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Tracks under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Planka and Tracks with Docker?

Planka: yes. Tracks: yes.

Related comparisons