Piped vs yarn.social
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Piped
Alternative front-end for YouTube
VS
yarn.social
Self-Hosted, Twitter™-like Decentralised micro-logging platform
| Feature | Piped | yarn.social |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Social Networks | Social Networks |
| License | AGPL-3.0-or-later | MIT |
| Language | Vue | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,168 | — |
| First released | 2024 | 2020 |
| Replaces | YouTube | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Piped if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 10.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Vue
Choose yarn.social if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Go
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Piped or yarn.social better?
Piped is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider yarn.social if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Piped and yarn.social free and open-source?
Yes. Piped is licensed under AGPL-3.0-or-later and yarn.social under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Piped and yarn.social with Docker?
Piped: check the project docs for container support. yarn.social: check the project docs for container support.