Piped vs Tube Archivist
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Piped
Alternative front-end for YouTube
VS
Tube Archivist
Self-hosted YouTube media server with metadata and search
| Feature | Piped | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Social Networks | Media Servers |
| License | AGPL-3.0-or-later | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Vue | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,168 | ★ 8,342 |
| First released | 2024 | 2021 |
| Replaces | YouTube | YouTube |
Why pick each one
Choose Piped if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 10.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Vue
Frequently asked questions
Is Piped or Tube Archivist better?
Piped is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Tube Archivist if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Piped and Tube Archivist free and open-source?
Yes. Piped is licensed under AGPL-3.0-or-later and Tube Archivist under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Piped and Tube Archivist with Docker?
Piped: check the project docs for container support. Tube Archivist: yes.