Piped vs Postmarks
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Piped | Postmarks |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Social Networks | Social Networks |
| License | AGPL-3.0-or-later | MIT |
| Language | Vue | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,168 | ★ 545 |
| First released | 2024 | 2023 |
| Replaces | YouTube | Pinboard, del.icio.us |
Why pick each one
Choose Piped if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 10.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Vue
Choose Postmarks if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Piped or Postmarks better?
Neither is universally better. Piped has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Piped and Postmarks free and open-source?
Yes. Piped is licensed under AGPL-3.0-or-later and Postmarks under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Piped and Postmarks with Docker?
Piped: check the project docs for container support. Postmarks: yes.