Picsur vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePicsurSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 1,245★ 33,952
First released20242015
ReplacesAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Picsur if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Picsur details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Picsur or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Picsur is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Picsur and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Picsur is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Picsur and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Picsur: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons