Pico vs Umbraco
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Pico | Umbraco |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | PHP | C# |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,904 | ★ 5,224 |
| First released | 2012 | 2005 |
| Replaces | WordPress | Sitecore, Kentico |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Pico or Umbraco better?
Neither is universally better. Umbraco has the larger community, while Pico is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Pico and Umbraco free and open-source?
Yes. Pico is licensed under MIT and Umbraco under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Pico and Umbraco with Docker?
Pico: yes. Umbraco: yes.