Photoview vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePhotoviewSRS
CategoryPhoto ManagementMedia Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageGoC++
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker
GitHub stars★ 6,496★ 29,105
First released20192025
ReplacesGoogle Photos

Why pick each one

Choose Photoview if…

  • Uses your folder structure
  • Lightweight
  • Easy setup
Photoview details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Photoview or SRS better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community, while Photoview is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Photoview and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. Photoview is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Photoview and SRS with Docker?

Photoview: yes. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons