Photoview vs Sigal
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Photoview
Simple photo gallery for personal servers
VS
Sigal
Simple static photo gallery generator written in Python
| Feature | Photoview | Sigal |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,496 | ★ 942 |
| First released | 2019 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Google Photos | Flickr |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Photoview or Sigal better?
Neither is universally better. Photoview has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Photoview and Sigal free and open-source?
Yes. Photoview is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Sigal under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Photoview and Sigal with Docker?
Photoview: yes. Sigal: check the project docs for container support.