Photoview vs Reservo
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Photoview
Simple photo gallery for personal servers
VS
Reservo
Scalable image hosting script with support for CDNs, paid account
| Feature | Photoview | Reservo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | ⊘ Proprietary |
| Language | Go | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,496 | — |
| First released | 2019 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Google Photos | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Reservo if…
- Released under the ⊘ Proprietary license
- Written in PHP
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Photoview or Reservo better?
Photoview is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Reservo if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Photoview and Reservo free and open-source?
Yes. Photoview is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Reservo under ⊘ Proprietary. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Photoview and Reservo with Docker?
Photoview: yes. Reservo: check the project docs for container support.