Peekaping vs Beszel Hub
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Peekaping
Self-hosted uptime monitoring and status page service
VS
Beszel Hub
Lightweight server resource monitoring agent network
| Feature | Peekaping | Beszel Hub |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,169 | ★ 8,946 |
| First released | 2024 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Pingdom, Better Uptime | Pingdom, Checkly |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Peekaping or Beszel Hub better?
Neither is universally better. Beszel Hub has the larger community, while Peekaping is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Peekaping and Beszel Hub free and open-source?
Yes. Peekaping is licensed under MIT and Beszel Hub under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Peekaping and Beszel Hub with Docker?
Peekaping: yes. Beszel Hub: yes.