PDF Arranger vs Readarr
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted e-books & media library options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
PDF Arranger
Desktop tool to merge, split, and rearrange PDF pages
VS
Readarr
E-book and audiobook collection manager
| Feature | PDF Arranger | Readarr |
|---|---|---|
| Category | E-books & Media Library | E-books & Media Library |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | C# |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, binary, source | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,760 | ★ 3,476 |
| First released | 2019 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Adobe Acrobat, PDFsam | Goodreads, Audible |
Why pick each one
Choose Readarr if…
- Automates collection
- Familiar Servarr interface
- Good metadata tracking
Frequently asked questions
Is PDF Arranger or Readarr better?
PDF Arranger is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Readarr if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are PDF Arranger and Readarr free and open-source?
Yes. PDF Arranger is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Readarr under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run PDF Arranger and Readarr with Docker?
PDF Arranger: check the project docs for container support. Readarr: yes.