Passit vs HashiCorp Vault
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Passit
Self-hosted password manager with browser extensions
VS
HashiCorp Vault
Secrets management and data protection for infrastructure
| Feature | Passit | HashiCorp Vault |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BUSL-1.1 |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 200 | ★ 36,086 |
| First released | 2016 | 2015 |
| Replaces | LastPass, 1Password | AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault |
Why pick each one
Choose HashiCorp Vault if…
- Industry standard for secrets
- Powerful policy engine
Frequently asked questions
Is Passit or HashiCorp Vault better?
Neither is universally better. HashiCorp Vault has the larger community, while Passit is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Passit and HashiCorp Vault free and open-source?
Yes. Passit is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and HashiCorp Vault under BUSL-1.1. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Passit and HashiCorp Vault with Docker?
Passit: yes. HashiCorp Vault: yes.