Papra vs WebDAV Server Go
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Papra
Minimalistic self-hosted document archiving platform
VS
WebDAV Server Go
Lightweight standalone WebDAV file server
| Feature | Papra | WebDAV Server Go |
|---|---|---|
| Category | E-books & Media Library | File Sync & Storage |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,160 | ★ 5,750 |
| First released | 2024 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Evernote, Dropbox | Dropbox |
Why pick each one
Choose WebDAV Server Go if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 5.8k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Papra or WebDAV Server Go better?
Neither is universally better. WebDAV Server Go has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Papra and WebDAV Server Go free and open-source?
Yes. Papra is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and WebDAV Server Go under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Papra and WebDAV Server Go with Docker?
Papra: yes. WebDAV Server Go: yes.