Papra vs PDF Arranger
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted e-books & media library options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Papra
Minimalistic self-hosted document archiving platform
VS
PDF Arranger
Desktop tool to merge, split, and rearrange PDF pages
| Feature | Papra | PDF Arranger |
|---|---|---|
| Category | E-books & Media Library | E-books & Media Library |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,160 | ★ 5,760 |
| First released | 2024 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Evernote, Dropbox | Adobe Acrobat, PDFsam |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Papra or PDF Arranger better?
Neither is universally better. PDF Arranger has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Papra and PDF Arranger free and open-source?
Yes. Papra is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and PDF Arranger under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Papra and PDF Arranger with Docker?
Papra: yes. PDF Arranger: check the project docs for container support.