PairDrop vs ShareDrop

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePairDropShareDrop
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageJavaScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 11,133★ 10,747
First released20222014
ReplacesAirDrop, WeTransferAirDrop, WeTransfer

Why pick each one

Choose PairDrop if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 11.1k GitHub stars
PairDrop details

Choose ShareDrop if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 10.7k GitHub stars
ShareDrop details

Frequently asked questions

Is PairDrop or ShareDrop better?

Neither is universally better. PairDrop has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are PairDrop and ShareDrop free and open-source?

Yes. PairDrop is licensed under GPL-3.0 and ShareDrop under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run PairDrop and ShareDrop with Docker?

PairDrop: yes. ShareDrop: yes.

Related comparisons