PaddleOCR vs SGLang

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted self-hosted ai options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePaddleOCRSGLang
CategorySelf-Hosted AISelf-Hosted AI
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguagePythonPython
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM2,048 MB16,384 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcedocker, kubernetes, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 87,227★ 31,514
First released20202024
ReplacesGoogle Cloud Vision, AWS TextractOpenAI API

Why pick each one

Choose PaddleOCR if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 87.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
PaddleOCR details

Choose SGLang if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 31.5k GitHub stars
SGLang details

Frequently asked questions

Is PaddleOCR or SGLang better?

PaddleOCR is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider SGLang if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are PaddleOCR and SGLang free and open-source?

Yes. PaddleOCR is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SGLang under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run PaddleOCR and SGLang with Docker?

PaddleOCR: yes. SGLang: yes.

Related comparisons