Overpass API vs Idunn
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Overpass API
Read-only query API for OpenStreetMap data
VS
Idunn
Geocoding and place API for self-hosted map frontends
| Feature | Overpass API | Idunn |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | C++ | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 911 | ★ 38 |
| First released | 2011 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Google Places API | Google Places API, Foursquare Places |
Why pick each one
Choose Idunn if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Overpass API or Idunn better?
Neither is universally better. Overpass API has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Overpass API and Idunn free and open-source?
Yes. Overpass API is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Idunn under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Overpass API and Idunn with Docker?
Overpass API: check the project docs for container support. Idunn: yes.