OpenTripPlanner vs wanderer
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OpenTripPlanner
Multimodal trip planning and transit routing engine
VS
wanderer
Trail database where you can upload your recorded tracks or create new
| Feature | OpenTripPlanner | wanderer |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 8,192 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,709 | ★ 3,802 |
| First released | 2009 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Google Maps Transit | — |
Why pick each one
Choose OpenTripPlanner if…
- Released under the LGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.7k GitHub stars)
- Written in Java
Choose wanderer if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenTripPlanner or wanderer better?
wanderer is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider OpenTripPlanner if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are OpenTripPlanner and wanderer free and open-source?
Yes. OpenTripPlanner is licensed under LGPL-3.0 and wanderer under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenTripPlanner and wanderer with Docker?
OpenTripPlanner: yes. wanderer: yes.