openstreetmap-tile-server vs OSRM

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featureopenstreetmap-tile-serverOSRM
CategoryMaps & GISMaps & GIS
LicenseMITBSD-2-Clause
LanguageShellC++
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM4,096 MB8,192 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 1,452★ 7,955
First released20172012
ReplacesGoogle MapsGoogle Directions API

Why pick each one

Choose openstreetmap-tile-server if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Shell
openstreetmap-tile-server details

Choose OSRM if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 8k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
OSRM details

Frequently asked questions

Is openstreetmap-tile-server or OSRM better?

Neither is universally better. OSRM has the larger community, while openstreetmap-tile-server is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are openstreetmap-tile-server and OSRM free and open-source?

Yes. openstreetmap-tile-server is licensed under MIT and OSRM under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run openstreetmap-tile-server and OSRM with Docker?

openstreetmap-tile-server: yes. OSRM: yes.

Related comparisons