OpenSlides vs ETAR
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted calendar & contacts options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OpenSlides
Presentation and assembly system for managing and projecting agenda,
VS
ETAR
Open-source calendar server companion for events
| Feature | OpenSlides | ETAR |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Calendar & Contacts | Calendar & Contacts |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Shell | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 629 | ★ 2,565 |
| First released | 2026 | 2016 |
| Replaces | — | Google Calendar |
Why pick each one
Choose OpenSlides if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Shell
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenSlides or ETAR better?
Neither is universally better. ETAR has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are OpenSlides and ETAR free and open-source?
Yes. OpenSlides is licensed under MIT and ETAR under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenSlides and ETAR with Docker?
OpenSlides: yes. ETAR: yes.