openrouteservice vs Traccar
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
openrouteservice
Routing, isochrones, and matrix API on OpenStreetMap
VS
Traccar
Open-source GPS tracking platform
| Feature | openrouteservice | Traccar |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Java | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 8,192 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,945 | ★ 7,563 |
| First released | 2017 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Google Directions API | Google Maps, Life360 |
Why pick each one
Choose openrouteservice if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
- Written in Java
Choose Traccar if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Java
Frequently asked questions
Is openrouteservice or Traccar better?
Traccar is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider openrouteservice if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are openrouteservice and Traccar free and open-source?
Yes. openrouteservice is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Traccar under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run openrouteservice and Traccar with Docker?
openrouteservice: yes. Traccar: yes.