OpenRCT2 vs Waterfall

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOpenRCT2Waterfall
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageC++Shell
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binary, sourcebare-metal, docker
GitHub stars★ 16,049★ 751
First released20142016
ReplacesRollerCoaster TycoonBungeeCord

Why pick each one

Choose OpenRCT2 if…

  • Faithful modern remake
  • Active community
OpenRCT2 details

Choose Waterfall if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Shell
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Waterfall details

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenRCT2 or Waterfall better?

Neither is universally better. OpenRCT2 has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are OpenRCT2 and Waterfall free and open-source?

Yes. OpenRCT2 is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Waterfall under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run OpenRCT2 and Waterfall with Docker?

OpenRCT2: check the project docs for container support. Waterfall: yes.

Related comparisons