OpenRCT2 vs Pitaya

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOpenRCT2Pitaya
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageC++Go
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binary, sourcedocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 16,049★ 2,819
First released20142018
ReplacesRollerCoaster Tycoonproprietary game backends

Why pick each one

Choose OpenRCT2 if…

  • Faithful modern remake
  • Active community
OpenRCT2 details

Choose Pitaya if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Active community (2.8k GitHub stars)
Pitaya details

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenRCT2 or Pitaya better?

OpenRCT2 is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Pitaya if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are OpenRCT2 and Pitaya free and open-source?

Yes. OpenRCT2 is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Pitaya under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run OpenRCT2 and Pitaya with Docker?

OpenRCT2: check the project docs for container support. Pitaya: yes.

Related comparisons