OpenLLM vs Xinference

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOpenLLMXinference
CategoryLocal LLM RunnersSelf-Hosted AI
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguagePythonPython
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM8,192 MB8,192 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes, source
GitHub stars★ 12,452★ 9,483
First released20232023
ReplacesOpenAI APIOpenAI API, Hugging Face Inference Endpoints

Why pick each one

Choose OpenLLM if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 12.5k GitHub stars
OpenLLM details

Choose Xinference if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 9.5k GitHub stars
Xinference details

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenLLM or Xinference better?

Neither is universally better. OpenLLM has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are OpenLLM and Xinference free and open-source?

Yes. OpenLLM is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Xinference under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run OpenLLM and Xinference with Docker?

OpenLLM: yes. Xinference: yes.

Related comparisons